forum.connpost.com
August 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
The Rules of Chess

ARCHIVES

  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • September 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • RECENT ENTRIES

  • A word about openings
  • Attack, attack, attack!
  • Chess in the media — again!
  • Chess sonata
  • From Kalmykia to Mexico City
  • Is chess a sport?
  • Let the bidding begin...
  • Off-side offense
  • Tune in to 'Chess Live Radio'
  • Under Pressure
  • Rene
    RenĂ© is a chess addict. It's practically his second religion. When he is not eating, drinking or dreaming chess — he enjoys writing, traveling, dancing, and life-sponging.

    René is Webmaster for connpost.com and this forum.

     
    Chess Corner
    "The chessboard is the world, the pieces are the phenomena of the Universe, the rules of the game are what we call the laws of Nature and the player on the other side is hidden from us" —Thomas Huxley

    « Patterns of Nature against the Arrangement of Chess | Main | Stay tuned... »

    August 24, 2005

    What's the best move?

    This question is almost a quandary.

    Chess is both simple and complex. Simultaneously. There are positions that require simple rapier-like thrusts to win even difficult games, while other games require a bit more than just a stab.

    It's baffling to find players buried in deep concentration in an attempt to find the "correct" move, when there wasn't much to think about.

    "The move was so obvious," a peeved kibitzer may offer to the players around the table. But when you're in the hot seat, you may be thinking close to a dozen moves that could work. Your mind starts to wander off and then, suddenly, you make the wrong move.

    After the game you tell yourself that the candidate move was obvious and after a closer look the move you made was a simple blunder that cost you the game.

    Often players think more about the games they've won, than the games they've lost. Interestingly enough you can learn more about yourself and the type of player that you are by studying the games you've lost. At the same time you also learn a thing or two about your opponent. You make it a goal to beat him next time by avoiding his traps; or avoiding positions that you're uncomfortable with; or simply avoid the opponent!

    Sometimes it's hard to tell when you're winning or losing. The position becomes a blur. But somehow, somewhere, you managed to play the correct moves. Your opponent has no choice but to resign. "Good game." This standard congratulatory remark, however, begs to ask "how did you win?"

    More on that later...

    Posted by rene on August 24, 2005 8:29 AM

    Comments

    Post a comment

    Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

    (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


    Remember me?


     

    Forum Weblogs
    Behind The Lines
    High School Sports
    Webologist
    Music Scene
    Joe's View
    Society Scene
    Soundin' Off
    Turned ON

    CONNPOST.COM

      HOME

      News

      Sports

      Business

      Entertainment

      Opinion

      Weather

      Death Notices

       

       

    Privacy Policy | Contact us
    ©2007 Connecticut Post Online. All rights reserved.