forum.connpost.com
July 2008
S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Storied Archives

  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005

  • Recent Entries

  • A shockingly bad movie
  • An actress with style
  • Ben Whishaw’s rising star
  • Doing things your own way
  • Jackie vs. Lauren: No contest
  •  
    Joe*s View
    Movie critic and feature writer, Joe Meyers, rambles and keeps us posted about theater, film, book and other cultural stuff that couldn't fit into his Connecticut Post columns.

    « No nudes is bad news in Chicago | Main | Not a "cozy," but what is it? »

    February 8, 2008

    Joan Crawford before her drag queen years

    So much of the Joan Crawford image and mythology grows out of the pictures she made in the 1940s and 1950s — when she was almost scarily tough and mannish — that it’s always a shock to see one of the movies she made for MGM in the 1930s when she was a much fresher and funnier actress.
    Warner Home Video recently sent me “The Joan Crawford Collection, Vol. 2,” a new boxed set of five Crawford pictures spanning the years from the early 1930s to the mid-1950s. The shocker for me was “Sadie McKee,” a 1934 star vehicle in which the 26-year-old actress plays the daughter of a rich family’s cook who winds up marrying a millionaire alcoholic (Edward Arnold).
    Crawford became such a caricature in the post-World War II era — and gravitated to such tough, almost heartless parts — that it is stunning to see how sweet and charming she was in her younger years.
    “Sadie McKee” is more a drama than a comedy, but Crawford plays the role with a light touch and there is a natural quality to the young woman’s attempt to make something out of herself after she follows the man she loves (Gene Raymond) to New York.
    Through a series of events too complicated to get into here, Sadie is ditched by her beau and gets married to a rich party animal she meets while working as a dancer in a disreputable nightclub.
    What makes the film so irresistible is how much we grow to care about Sadie and how down-to-earth and nice she is (“nice” is something you would never say about the characters Crawford started playing a decade later).
    The movie’s treatment of alcoholism is remarkably modern. Sadie becomes determined to help her husband kick his addiction in well-written and well-played scenes that don’t feel at all dated.
    Although she was very popular in the early 1930s, Crawford began to fall out of fashion by the end of the decade and her contract was dropped by MGM.
    The actress was saved by Warner Bros. and “Mildred Pierce” in 1945, but moviegoers never again saw the sweet, girlish star of “Sadie McKee.”
    (Warner Home Video is releasing “The Joan Crawford Collection, Vol. 2” on DVD Tuesday.)

    Posted by Joe on February 8, 2008 5:41 PM

    Comments

    Post a comment




    Remember Me?





     


    Forum Weblogs
    Behind The Lines
    High School Sports
    Webologist
    Music Scene
    Joe's View
    Society Scene
    Soundin' Off
    Turned ON

    CONNPOST.COM

      HOME

      News

      Sports

      Business

      Entertainment

      Opinion

      Weather

      Death Notices

    Privacy Policy | Contact us
    ©2008 Connecticut Post Online. All rights reserved.