forum.connpost.com
December 2008
S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Storied Archives

  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005

  • Recent Entries

  • Chinatown noir
  • Broadway’s best go caroling again
  • Disney + “Wicked” = “Shrek The Musical”
  • Doomsday nostalgia
  • Home sweet Heaven
  •  
    Joe*s View
    Movie critic and feature writer, Joe Meyers, rambles and keeps us posted about theater, film, book and other cultural stuff that couldn't fit into his Connecticut Post columns.

    « Ben Whishaw’s rising star | Main | Jackie vs. Lauren: No contest »

    July 3, 2008

    A shockingly bad movie

    The new Will Smith movie “Hancock” is the only major studio release to open during the July 4 weekend, so the box-office figures on Sunday should be strong.
    Word of mouth has got to be deadly, however; this is one of the worst summer movie star vehicles since Arnold Schwazenegger’s “Last Action Hero” in 1993. That turkey had a decent opening weekend, too, but the star’s reputation took a big hit — Schwarzenegger was no longer the sure thing he represented during the previous decade.
    The pressure on big box-office stars to deliver is intense. The bigger they get, the bigger the budgets become, and record-breaking grosses are expected for every movie.
    Years ago, Meryl Streep gave a speech where she complained about the huge discrepancy between the star salaries paid to men and women. She had already won two Oscars by that point, but was earning a pittance compared to male counterparts such as Kevin Costner and Harrison Ford.
    Streep had a point, but perhaps her lower salaries and her continuing willingness to take chances on low-budget movies (such as "A Prairie Home Companion") are responsible for the actress still being a prestigious in-demand performer, while many of her 1980s and 1990s male peers have faded out. The terrific performer has the starring role in “Mamma Mia!” opening July 18 and will be seen in the film version of the Pulitzer Prize-winning play “Doubt” late this year or early in 2009.
    Will Smith has been a money-in-the-bank star for more than a decade now — can you believe “Independence Day” opened 12 years ago this weekend? — but he appears to be losing his edge and his knack for finding good material.
    “Hancock” is a messy, nasty piece of work that is poorly made to boot — it’s distressing to see a major talent misuse his gifts this way. And I don’t think audiences will keep Will Smith at the top of the movie star heap if he keeps making duds like this one.

    Posted by Joe on July 3, 2008 1:54 PM

    Comments

    Post a comment




    Remember Me?





     


    Forum Weblogs
    Behind The Lines
    High School Sports
    Webologist
    Music Scene
    Joe's View
    Society Scene
    Soundin' Off
    Turned ON

    CONNPOST.COM

    Privacy Policy | Contact us
    ©2008 Connecticut Post Online. All rights reserved.