forum.connpost.com
November 2008
S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Storied Archives

  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008

  • Recent Entries

  • Caruso Growls At The Hand That Might Feed Him
  • Dept. of Consumer Protection, or EMPLOYEE Protection?
  • Gays, Aptly GLAD about Connecticut, Target New England
  • Himes Knows Bridgeport Will Make or Break Election Day
  • If You Supported Obama, Thank Ned Lamont
  • No News Here: Dodd Talks Out of Both Sides of His Mouth
  • Rell, Avoiding Possible Cat Fight With Palin, Blows Off RGA Conference
  • Shameless Rowland, Unloved Outside Waterbury, Hangs With His GOP Homeboys in Miami
  •  
    Politics by Ken Dixon

    « Public Financing OF Elections Is Almost As Good As Free-Media Exposure In Special Session | Main | State Takes Baby Steps Toward Alternative Fuels »

    August 4, 2008

    Lawmakers Punted Chance to Lead Against Plastics

    Monday, August 4, 2008

    If you're the glass-is-half-full type, you can tell yourself that Connecticut's General Assembly paved the way for a new federal law banning toys and child-care items including pacifiers that contain a half dozen types of plastic softeners called phthalates.
    But the reality is, state lawmakers caved to the plastics industry and killed a proposal last spring that would ban the plastics. During a telling news conference, a Harvard post-doc talked about emerging evidence of developmental problems in children exposed to phthalates.
    Yes, the state passed a new law against lead toys. That was a no-brainer. Farther-sighted, braver state lawmakers would have included the plastics.
    Sarah Uhl, coordinator for the non-profit Clean Water Action, said today that the state lead standard was important and even the ignored plastics legislation sent a message.
    "By introducing a bill to phase out phthalates and by joining other states in a rigorous public discourse about the need for a phthalates ban, Connecticut helped put the writing on the wall," she said. "In the end, enough manufacturers,retailers,and members of Congress read this writing and realized that the clock was ticking on the continued use of toxic phthalates in children's products. When big manufacturers like Wal-Mart and Toys "R" Us began publically announcing plans to stop using phthalates, that left the companies that actually produce these toxins- like Exxon Mobil-- to campaign against the ban. It was a close fight that many thought could not be won, but in the end the leadership of the states- and the concerned consumers in those states- drovemarket shifts and state policies that paved the way for the federal win."

    Posted by Ken on August 4, 2008 5:57 PM

    Trackback Pings

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://forum.connpost.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1649

    Comments

    Ken Dixon I thank you so much for you poignant delivery and good sense of satire, if not pungent performance of a intuitive writer.
    I see you too are not toying around with the issue of serious health issues with the use of phthalates in infant and children's products. Some legislators, choosing to become blind to evidence of children exhibiting in "this generation" already, hormone disrupting health issues associated with phthalate exposure, missed hearing a clock ticking in their favor indeed. When I personally spoke with Dr. Carl Baum, Director of Toxicology, Pediactrics, Yale. He concurs "the why wait theory" for further evidence in next generations when health evidence is already there, does not apply. Toys "R" us can see ahead and addresses the consumer, the parents, and knows in time, with knowledge, they will not reach for the 'toxic' toy for their loved ones. Brave is the marketing which protects their most important product...the children. The clock ticks also for our important product, our children with unnecessary exposure to toxic phthalates. Toy industry can squeeze the American dollar and time out of one states session, instead of using wisdom for protection, now and ahead on all levels, but this is essentially a government by the people, the parents, the consumers, the health of our generations. The states will prevail. We will not let the glass be half empty, full with the other half in floating toxins, killing them slowly by the" no brainer", lead removal only.
    Thank you Ken Dixon for your fine reporting and writing.
    Joyce Acebo~Raguskus
    Chair Diesel Cleanup, ECC
    Member: Coalition for Env. Justice
    Coalition for Safe & Healthy CT
    etc.
    etc.

    Posted by: Joyce Acebo~Raguskus at August 5, 2008 11:56 AM

    Dear Ken,
    Thank you for your attention to this very important issue. Recent actions banning lead at the state level and phthalates at the federal level introduce significant preventive measures in our efforts to protect and improve children's health. Hopefully there will be similar state and/or federal actions on Bisphenol A (BPA), another chemical found in plastics with equally hazardous health effects, in the near future.

    Annamarie Beaulieu
    Campaign Director
    Connnecticut Public Health Association

    Posted by: Annamarie Beaulieu at August 11, 2008 10:40 AM

    Post a comment




    Remember Me?

    (you may use HTML tags for style)




     

    20061101__kendixon_mug.jpg


    Forum Weblogs
    Behind The Lines
    UConn women basketball
    Sports of all sorts
    Tales from Sixth Period
    High School Sports
    Music Scene
    Webologist
    Joe's View
    Society Scene
    Soundin' Off
    Turned ON

    CONNPOST.COM

    Privacy Policy | Contact us | ©2007 Connecticut Post Online All rights reserved.